The Best Gaming Monitors
The Best Gaming Monitors And Their Prices, Looking for the best Gaming Monitors we have got you covered. In this post, you will get to know the best monitor for your games.
Acer SB220Q 21.5 ($100+)
Let’s begin with a sum of $100. To be honest, you won’t get much out of your money if you buy a $100 monitor for gaming.
There is only a handful of $100 displays on the market, and the vast majority are very basic business monitors with out-of-date specs and hardware.
The basic lowest you should anticipate paying for an entry-level monitor is roughly $130; otherwise, we’re talking about displays with resolutions lower than 1080p, which may not be worth purchasing in 2022.
The Acer SB220Q, which is really the only screen in this category that we’ve tested, costs $130, although there are numerous other options that look to be using the same 22″ 1080p 75Hz IPS panel, or some such similar.
Surprisingly, this monitor used to sell for as cheap as $90 when we evaluated it. This monitor is perfectly adequate as a low-cost entry-level display for individuals who cannot afford to spend a lot more money.
We’d much rather you get this than something with a TN LCD and a crushing 1600 x 900 resolution, while some screens are still available for a few dollars cheaper.
It’s not a great gaming display because it has issues with response time, has a low contrast ratio, doesn’t get very bright, and is only capable of running at 75Hz.
However, it has a price advantage over other options due to the use of IPS technology and a 75Hz refresh rate. With that stated, we’d stay away from monitors under $100 if at all feasible.
AOC 24G2 24 ($200)
A 1080p 144Hz IPS display is the best option for $200. This price bracket is dominated by this sort of display, which is a good entry-level gaming option.
The switch to 144Hz delivers a significant improvement in gaming smoothness and clarity, and the panel quality is typically much greater, with faster performance, better contrast ratios, and superior colors.
What you can buy for $200 these days is actually quite astounding.
The good, old, and trustworthy AOC 24G2 is our go-to suggestion for around $200. This is the 24″ model, which we believe has a little higher pixel density for 1080p, but there is also a 27″ model for the same price if you need something a little bigger, the 27G2.
The AOC 24G2 is a fantastic gaming monitor with excellent color quality. To keep up, it offers a good 144Hz refresh rate and quick response times, as well as a decent contrast ratio, outstanding viewing angles, and a wide color gamut.
It also comes with a height-adjustable stand, which is far more adaptable than the fixed supports seen on many other screens, such as the LG 24GN600.
We believe it is worthwhile to spend a little more to have a much nicer stand. The 24G2 is a well-balanced kit with many options.
LG 27GL83A 27 ($300)
You have the option of obtaining a 1080p 240Hz faster refresh rate monitor or upgrading to 1440p at this price point, and we’d almost always go with 1440p.
In terms of image quality and sharpness, the rise from 1080p to 1440p is significant. It also makes larger displays, such as 27″, more practical, and it isn’t overly taxing on recent GPUs.
In most 1440p games, today’s mid-range GPUs can deliver more than 60 frames per second. Even if it’s on the more inexpensive end of the scale, a nice 1440p 144Hz monitor for roughly $300 may last a long time.
At the moment, we propose the LG 27GL83A, which costs $300. Depending on a somewhat LG Nano IPS screen, this is a variant of the LG 27GL850 we tested a while back.
While we don’t think these screens are super competitive at the $500 price point, we think they’re a wonderful deal at $300.
For an LCD in this class, the response times are excellent, and the brightness and refresh rate are both respectable at 1440p 144Hz.
This was the first iteration of fast IPS panels, that are now popular and, in terms of motion clarity, are still holding up in 2022. We receive outstanding viewing angles and color performance in addition to great gaming performance, making the 27GL83A a flexible monitor for both gaming and daily work like browsing the web.
The only significant flaw is the contrast ratio: on these LG Nano IPS panels, blacks don’t go particularly dark, which is a trade-off for the quickness. However, because it employs a standard RGB subpixel architecture, it’s often faster and, at the time of writing, less expensive than the Gigabyte M27Q, which we previously recommended.
A premium 1440p moderate rate monitor with a $400 price tag is your best bet. The difference between $300 and $400 is that you’ll get faster response times, excellent contrast ratios, color options gamuts, and a more comprehensive feature set.
It is up to you to decide whether or not this is worthwhile. Although we believe the $300 category offers superior value, we wouldn’t rule out obtaining a premium choice because they do perform better in some cases.
The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD, one of the top 1440p 165Hz monitors available in this price range, is our pick. In comparison to the 27GL83A, response times are comparable to today’s fast IPS monitors, with the exception of a little increase in refresh rate (165Hz vs 144Hz).
However, the color quality is a significant advantage. When panel variance is taken into account, the MAG has a 30 to 40% greater contrast ratio than 1440p LG Nano IPS monitors, which means we get Nano IPS-like performance without the drawbacks.
Although we’re still talking about IPS-level contrast, which is only slightly greater than 1000:1, the difference in black levels when gaming in darker settings is noticeable.
The MAG274QRF-QD features a substantially wider color gamut than the MAG274QRF-QD, with 99 percent coverage of both DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB, making it a very adaptable display for gaming and content creation.
It has the color side of the equation covered with built-in color options for various gamuts, including sRGB (thanks to a recent firmware upgrade).
If you desire greater motion clarity when playing competitive games, MSI also offers effective backlight strobing, which is something that many displays of this type struggle with. At $420, we think it’s a wonderful deal.
Gigabyte M27Q-X 27 ($500)
The $500 price point is a bit of a strange one right now, resting somewhere between mid-range displays like the 1440p 165Hz monitors we’ve been looking at and higher-end luxury items.
We had no intention of recommending anything in this price range until one monitor attracted our attention.
The Gigabyte M27Q-X takes a 1440p 240Hz IPS display to the lowest price point in its history, at just $500. That appears to be a fantastic deal, but we haven’t tested this display yet, so placing it here is a gamble, especially since our full review isn’t due for another few weeks.
Samsung Odyssey G7 32 ($600)
The 32-inch Samsung Odyssey G7 is presently available for slightly under $600. This is a fantastic deal for the 1440p 240Hz VA monitor, which is a significant improvement over the lower refresh rate options we discussed at $300 and $400.
Although there is a significant price difference, the Odyssey G7 should provide many more years of service due to its higher-end, more future-proof characteristics.
The primary reason to purchase an Odyssey G7 is for its gaming capabilities. Samsung’s highly calibrated VA technology, combined with a 1440p resolution and 240Hz refresh rate, gives exceptional speed and motion clarity.
This monitor is still one of the quickest LCD displays available, with response times in the 3ms area that complements the high refresh rate without the black smearing that other VA monitors suffer from.
Running today’s games at 1440p 240 FPS is often a problem, but the G7 allows you the opportunity to grow as technology improves, and you can enjoy the latency advantages of super-fast frame rates for competitive gaming even now.
Due to its usage of a VA screen, the G7 has a high contrast ratio for an LCD monitor, making it a good buy. If you frequently game in a dark area, the 2500:1 contrast ratio is much over double that of IPS rivals, making this an excellent pick.
It has certain flaws, like the harsh 1000R curvature, which restricts its utility as a content creation display, but for $600, it’s a fantastic deal for gamers.
Gigabyte M28U 28 ($700)
This is where we’d go for a 4K gaming monitor, and happily, you don’t have to pay the full $700 to get a good one. The Gigabyte M28U is our display of choice, as it is still one of the best-value 4K high-refresh gaming monitors on the market.
It’s less expensive than its competitors, who frequently start at $700 or even $800 for the same panel, so it’s difficult to beat what Gigabyte has to offer.
The M28U is a flat IPS panel with HDMI 2.1 and a 4K 144Hz refresh rate. Performance is impressive for a monitor with these characteristics that is on the lower end of the price spectrum.
Fast response speeds, good color performance, wide viewing angles, reduced input latency, and a large color spectrum are all advantages.
It’s not the finest 4K display for gaming overall, but it strikes a nice mix between aesthetics and quickness that the Odyssey G7 lacks.
Of course, there’s a toss-up between high refresh 1440p and 4K 144Hz in these pricing ranges, and we can’t say which is “better.” 1440p 240Hz is preferable for pure gaming, while 4K 144Hz is a more adaptable option for both gaming and productivity.
With the Gigabyte M32U, you can upgrade your 28″ 4K 144Hz gaming monitor, such as the M28U, to a 32-inch version for $800.
We haven’t tried this specific monitor, but it should utilize the same panel as one of the 32-inch models we’ve seen so far — in fact, we expect it to function similarly to the Aorus FI32U, which was a good option.
The M32U is now available at a promotional price of just $600, which is a great value, but even at its regular price of $800, this display is less expensive than most of its competition, which costs $900 or even $1,000.
The 32-inch 4K 144Hz alternatives haven’t pleased us, and we prefer the smaller 28″ or 27″ ones when they’re available because they perform better. However, if you do require a larger monitor, and 4K is well suited to 32″, we recommend the M32U, which is now available on the market.
Eve Spectrum 4K 27 ($900)
This is where you’ll find the top-of-the-line 4K 144Hz gaming monitors. They won’t be as good a deal as the Gigabyte M28U in the $700 category, but if you have $900 to spare and want a no-compromise experience with extra capabilities, there are some advantages to be had.
The Eve Spectrum 4K, which costs $900 when you include the stand, is our best pick in this category. When it comes to speed and motion clarity, the Eve Spectrum is comparable to the M28U, providing a decent mix of performance at the highest refresh rate and across the refresh spectrum.
The Eve, on the other hand, excels in color performance and adds to the variety offered by 4K 144Hz IPS panels.
The factory calibration on this monitor is excellent and ready to use right out of the box, it has a larger color gamut, and Eve has better settings for features like overdrive and backlight strobing than other displays.
Eve as a business must put in some effort to deliver a positive client experience, but the end result is something we can suggest if you want a quality experience. Aside from that, there are more affordable 4K monitors that provide better value for money.
LG C1 OLED 48 TV ($1,000)
The LG C1 48-inch OLED TV is a clear alternative for PC gamers today, albeit it may not be realistic for all purchasers, and it costs $1,000. These displays are now available for just under $1000, a fantastic price for a high-end, premium picture quality OLED that combines 4K 120Hz gaming with genuine HDR capability.
With the new C2 series scheduled to launch soon, we can’t say how long this price will last, but there’s simply no other display on the market right now that can compete with the image quality of an LG OLED for the same price.
The advantages of switching to OLED are well documented, and we recommend reading our review for all the details, but the nitty-gritty is this: substantially quicker response instances than any LCD monitor, self-lit pixels for the best HDR encounter, extremely deep blacks with a contrast ratio that far outpaces LCDs, and amazing color quality with a great angle of view. The LG C1 features a superb feature set that makes it perfect for use as a PC gaming display as well as a TV if you have additional devices to connect, such as game consoles.
However, OLEDs have significant disadvantages, including the possibility of irreversible burn-in, poor intensity, reflective display coating, automatic brightness limiter, and, of course, size, which makes the C1 unsuitable for use as a daily desktop monitor. However, there is currently nothing better for $1,000 in terms of content intake and gaming display.
$1,000+ Alienware 34 QD-OLED 34 Curved
What if you have a budget of more than $1,000? The Alienware AW3423DW QD-OLED appears to be the display to get right now.
We’re still working on that review, but you’ll hear more about it soon. For the time being, it’s safe to say that a lot of other highly pricey displays pale in comparison to this QD-OLED ultrawide screen.
That’s all there is to it. This isn’t designed to be a complete monitor buying guide, as we stated in the introduction. Please see our prior recommendation features for more information on which screens are worth purchasing.
We didn’t get to discuss 1080p 240Hz panels, ultrawide screens, or some of the premium 1440p 240Hz alternatives, for example.
However, if you’re considering getting into PC gaming or simply need a new display for your current setup, the options we’ve mentioned today are a terrific place to start for all budgets.
The Best Gaming Monitors